Editorial Standards

Real stories. Clean claims. Controlled amplification.

Relvage builds visibility around credible, reviewable, and strategically useful information. These standards guide press materials, creator briefs, AI personas, and crisis communication.

Submission Requirements

What we need before we move a story.

Verified Facts Names, dates, figures, claims, links, source material, and approvals must be accurate.
News Value Announcements should have a clear reason to exist beyond promotion or hype.
Approved Assets Images, logos, bios, quotes, product visuals, and media files must be cleared for use.
Brand Boundaries We define what can be said, what needs evidence, and what should stay internal.
Compliance Rules

We protect attention by protecting trust.

Relvage may decline or revise materials that create legal, ethical, reputational, or platform risk. High-visibility work only lasts when the underlying claims can survive scrutiny.

No False Proof

We do not support invented partnerships, inflated results, fake awards, or unverified performance claims.

No Deception

We do not support impersonation, hidden conflicts, misleading creator briefs, or undisclosed synthetic identities.

No Harm Campaigns

We do not support harassment, abuse, defamatory attacks, or manipulative public-pressure campaigns.

Editorial FAQ

How review works.

Can Relvage edit submitted materials?

Yes. We may rewrite for clarity, structure, editorial usefulness, compliance, channel fit, and stronger narrative discipline.

Are placements guaranteed?

Any guaranteed deliverable must be confirmed in writing. Editorial acceptance, timing, search visibility, and audience response can vary by outlet, platform, and campaign context.

Can we use AI-generated assets?

Yes, when they are properly governed. AI personas, images, scripts, and responses need approval rules, identity boundaries, and brand-safety review.

What happens if a claim cannot be verified?

We either remove it, soften it, request evidence, or reshape the story around stronger proof. Credibility beats exaggeration.